Back to all judges

The Honorable Brian E. Gnage

Division 17·Pinellas County · Florida
494 cases since 202033% FJ rate
Division Context

Section 17 - Pinellas County Family Law Division. Handles dissolution proceedings, temporary and final relief on custody and support, enforcement of marital settlement agreements, and post-judgment modifications. 6th Judicial Circuit family bench.

How the judge operates

Judge Brian E. Gnage has been on the family law bench since 2022 after serving as an Assistant State Attorney in the 6th Judicial Circuit (2011-2020) with focus on sexual violence, domestic violence, and stalking cases, followed by a year as a Pinellas County Court Judge. He operates with a prosecutor's operational style and handles the full range of Section 17 family law matters—dissolutions, custody, support, and post-judgment enforcement.

Background

CourthouseSt. Petersburg Judicial Building
Year on Bench2022
Law SchoolStetson University College of Law
UndergraduateFlorida State University
Assumed OfficeJanuary 2022
Pre-Bench CareerAssistant State Attorney, 6th Judicial Circuit (2011-2020), handling sexual violence, domestic violence, stalking, and felony trials; Pinellas County Court Judge (2021-2022)
Bar Associations
The Florida BarSt. Pete Bar AssociationClearwater Bar AssociationFederalist Society

Closed Dissolution Cases

From 7,853 dissolution cases · Pinellas County · 2020–2026

Total Cases494
Final Judgments16433%
Dismissed0
Avg Filings / Case119
With Children164
Without Children120
Reopened Cases157

Most Frequent Attorneys

Bar & Civic Roles

  • Appointed Pinellas County Court by Governor DeSantis Dec 18 2020
  • elevated to 6th Judicial Circuit Jan 31 2022. ASA 6th Circuit 2011-2020. Florida State University undergrad, Stetson College of Law J.D. (FL Bar #88637).

Brian E. Gnage is modeled as a prosecutor bench actor in Section 17, with 2 graph connections and 0 documented trap signals.

All data sourced from public court records. Judges are bound by Florida law, not personal tendencies. Past case patterns reflect caseload composition and case complexity — they do not predict how a judge will rule in your specific case.